Announcement

Collapse

INTRODUCTION - PLEASE READ FIRST TO UNDERSTAND THIS FORUM!

"This Harbeth User Group (HUG) is the Manufacturer's own managed forum dedicated to natural sound from microphone to ear, achievable by recognising and controlling the numerous confounding variables that exist along the audio chain. The Harbeth designer's objective is to make loudspeakers that contribute little of themselves to the music passing through them.

Identifying system components for their sonic neutrality should logically proceed from the interpretation and analysis of their technical, objective performance, since deviations from a flat frequency response at any point along the signal chain from microphone to ear is likely to create an audible sonic personality in what you hear. That includes the contribution of the listening room itself. To accurately reproduce the recorded sound, as Harbeth speakers are designed to do, you would be advised to select system components (sources, electronics, cables and so on) that do not color the sound before it reaches the speakers.

For example, the design of and interaction between the hifi amplifier and its speaker load can and potentially will alter the sound balance of what you hear. This may or may not be what you wish to achieve, but on the face of it, any deviation from a flat response - and the frequency balance of tube amplifiers are usually influenced by their speaker load - is a step away from a truly neutral system. HUG has extensively discussed amplifiers and the methods for seeking the most objectively neutral amongst a plethora of available product choices.

HUG specialises in making complex technical matters simple to understand, aiding the identification of audio components likely to maintain a faithful relationship between the recorded sound and the sound you hear. With our heritage of natural sound and pragmatism, HUG cannot be expected to be a place to discuss the selection, approval or endorsement of non-Harbeth system elements selected, knowingly or not, to create a significantly personalised sound. For that you should do your own research and above all, make the effort to visit an Authorised Dealer and listen to your music at your loudness on your loudspeakers through the various offerings there. There is really no on-line substitute for time invested in a dealer's showroom because 'tuning' your system to taste is such a highly personal matter.

Please consider carefully how much you should rely upon and be influenced by the subjective opinions of strangers. Their hearing acuity and taste will be different to yours, as will be their motives and budget, their listening distance, loudness and room treatment, not necessarily leading to appropriate equipment selection and listening satisfaction for you.

If faithfully reproducing the sound intended by the composer, score, conductor and musicians in your home and over Harbeth speakers is your audio dream, then understanding something of the issues likely to fulfill that intention is what this forum has been helping to do since 2006. Welcome!"


Feb. 2018
See more
See less

"Audio and technological myths" - the Top Ten most incredible

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "Audio and technological myths" - the Top Ten most incredible

    Near the bottom of this article read the Engineering and Technology magazine "Top ten craziest audio 'enhancements'". If you believe even one of those maybe musical appreciation is impossible for you?

    Read here.

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Not All Science, But How About a Little Science?

    Originally posted by Reinhard View Post
    Those who read your arguments carefully, Bruce, might get the impression that you are a little afraid of people "who's belief system is closed off from rational arguments". If they "convince themselves" that they hear differences, why not let them? Why do you on the other hand try to convince them of the opposite? Seems to me quite as irrational, only vice versa.
    Why not let them? Because they are doing harm. Surely it cannot be irrational to defend something you care about. As Alan has pointed out, audiophilia is in the process of killing serious audio.

    Originally posted by Reinhard View Post
    People who's belief system only relies on science seem to forget that they only got the science of the year 2012. Perhaps there are psycho-acoustic effects which can be proven later. Who knows? ;-)).
    I never advocated for a belief system that relies on only science. In the meantime, I'm not going to jump from a plane without a parachute, hoping that on the way down advances in science will allow me to turn gravity off before I smash into the ground.

    Bruce

    Leave a comment:


  • Pluto
    replied
    Audiophiles are skydivers, without parachutes - why?

    After over 30 years in professional audio, I've learned a few things about electronics, about sound and above all, about people.

    Amongst the things I've learned is that if one jumps out of an aircraft without a parachute, the eventual impact is likely to do fatal harm.

    Why on Earth do so many audiophiles insist that skydiving without a parachute is worth attempting because it might prove that science is not always right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Reinhard
    replied
    Keelping an open mind

    Originally posted by Euler View Post
    ...With audiophilia, on the other hand, you have folks (including reviewers) going on and on about the transparency of this cable or the musicality of this preamp. It's all so psychological -- ignoring science and engineering, they convince themselves that they would be able to hear differences if the levels were matched, but of course this belief is never put to the test -- and these strong psychological forces keep the belief system of the audiophiliac closed off from rational counter-argument...

    Bruce
    Those who read your arguments carefully, Bruce, might get the impression that you are a little afraid of people "who's belief system is closed off from rational arguments". If they "convince themselves" that they hear differences, why not let them? Why do you on the other hand try to convince them of the opposite? Seems to me quite as irrational, only vice versa. As I said: tolerance.

    People who's belief system only relies on science seem to forget that they only got the science of the year 2012. Perhaps there are psycho-acoustic effects which can be proven later. Who knows? ;-)).

    Leave a comment:


  • P.C.
    replied
    Hearing versus seeing

    This months, july 2012' editorial of the absolute sounds found here http://www.enjoythemusic.com/tas/ could be of interest re :photography v audio raised in the last few posts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Gear Yes, But Greater Irrationality in Audiophilia (healing crystal clusters?)

    Originally posted by EricW View Post
    I'm congenitally wary of absolutes, but on the whole I think that the hallmark of the "audiophile" is that he or she (oh, who am I kidding, he) is more in love with the equipment than the music, and the whole fascination with "tweaks" is part of this. Whether it's audio, cycling, cars, golf (I have spent many enjoyable hours with a friend putting together clubs to the most exacting specifications, though I can't say it improved my actual golf game much), photography, etc. people (mostly male) are fascinated by the gear. [snip]
    Yes, there's a fascination with gear in audiophilia, as in, for example, photography. But at least in photography higher priced gear generally speaking comes with measurable improvements that can be observed in the resulting photographs or in the process of taking the photographs: less noise in low light, finer resolution in large prints, quicker and more accurate autofocus, a wider contrast range so that more detail appears in the shadows and highlights, etc..

    With audiophilia, on the other hand, you have folks (including reviewers) going on and on about the transparency of this cable or the musicality of this preamp. It's all so psychological -- ignoring science and engineering, they convince themselves that they would be able to hear differences if the levels were matched, but of course this belief is never put to the test -- and these strong psychological forces keep the belief system of the audiophiliac closed off from rational counter-argument.

    So it seems to me there's more here than the fascination with gear. Entering the audiophiliacs world is like visiting Santa Fe, New Mexico, and listening to the talk of "healing crystal clusters," "selenite for sealing aura from energy leaks," "aura photographers," "crystals having a lovely energy," and so on.

    Bruce

    Leave a comment:


  • EricW
    replied
    Equipment vs. Music and the 'tweakoid'

    I'm congenitally wary of absolutes, but on the whole I think that the hallmark of the "audiophile" is that he or she (oh, who am I kidding, he) is more in love with the equipment than the music, and the whole fascination with "tweaks" is part of this. Whether it's audio, cycling, cars, golf (I have spent many enjoyable hours with a friend putting together clubs to the most exacting specifications, though I can't say it improved my actual golf game much), photography, etc. people (mostly male) are fascinated by the gear.

    And that's fine, up to a point. The problem, as Alan has pointed out, is that there's probably a much larger group who would like quality music reproduction, and would be willing and able to pay for it, but are scared away by the obsessive, cultish, tweakoid fantasy world that too many audiophiles (not all, though) seem to inhabit.

    I almost think it calls for a new name and a new form of marketing to signal the difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Macjager
    replied
    Getting edumacated in nuw werds

    eventually, I find the most interesting part on most audio sites to be the word association threads. Very little in opinion on audio, just some fun with words...more educational frankly...glad that here there is no word association thread...:-)


    cheers

    george

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Audiophilia is The Grim Reaper

    Originally posted by Reinhard View Post
    Hm,

    in all hifi forums all over the world you will find thousands of threads about "hifi myths", "idiots" who hear differences between loudspeaker cables etc. Thousands of "experts" try to prove what you are able to hear and what you cannot (in their opinion). When I read one of those forum threads, the word intolerance comes to my mind.
    To me, more interesting than the discussion about hifi myths is question why it is so important for some people to bash others. Alan probably would say: listen to the music and relax. Mocking about other people always is said to be a sign for little self-consciousness, just ask a psychologist about this. Live and let live. ;-)

    Just my 2 cents...
    In my opinion, Alan et. al. have actually been amazingly tolerant of this goofiness. They are not "bashing others," but rather trying -- in a variety of ways, including sometimes sarcasm, when nothing else has any effect -- to bring some semblance of common sense, based in the facts of science and engineering, to the audiophile world. This is valuable (and frustrating) work on their part, for this unscientific audiophilia nonsense is killing the business of serious audio.

    Bruce

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Good engineering?

    Dear Mr. Reinhard,
    thank you for yor opinion on my winner proposal. Just before I read your post I was reading this:

    http://www.harbeth.co.uk/usergroup/s...od-engineering........

    Leave a comment:


  • Reinhard
    replied
    HiFi myths and live and let live?

    Hm,

    in all hifi forums all over the world you will find thousands of threads about "hifi myths", "idiots" who hear differences between loudspeaker cables etc. Thousands of "experts" try to prove what you are able to hear and what you cannot (in their opinion). When I read one of those forum threads, the word intolerance comes to my mind.

    To me, more interesting than the discussion about hifi myths is question why it is so important for some people to bash others. Alan probably would say: listen to the music and relax. Mocking about other people always is said to be a sign for little self-consciousness, just ask a psychologist about this. Live and let live. ;-)

    Just my 2 cents...

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    More like a trumpet ...

    I think this is unbeatable #1!

    http://www.highendnovum.de/index.php...mid=61&lang=en

    P.S. there is also a Premium version of the PMR© (Passiver-Multivokal-Resonator)

    {Moderator's comment: we're not quite sure what this product does or how it works, but we strongly endorse prospective customers discovering for themselves.}

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Beranek's syndrome alive and well in the tropics

    A friend modified an amplifier and was very happy with the results. After his success with his first amp he bought a similar amplifier to modify it as well but only to find out the amplifier in its original unmodified condition sounded way better than his modified amp. He gave up the idea of modifying after that. He was without a reference when he altered the original amplifier and let his heart to rule over his head or in this case his ears.

    Another person built his own 3 way speakers with one set of extra tweeters at the rear of the speakers that was rated by the local audiophile community to be better than most famous brands. The only thing I cant explain about his system was why the phase test merely moved the image from centre to the back not the usual in focus and with no apparent direction with out phase. An obvious fault but probably suffering from Beranek's syndrome.

    ST

    Leave a comment:


  • HUG-1
    replied
    Beranek's Law of speaker design

    From one of the founding fathers of acoustic science ...

    "It has been remarked that if one selects his own components, builds his own enclosure, and is convinced he has made a wise choice of design, then his own loudspeaker sounds better to him than does anyone else's loudspeaker. In this case, the frequency response of the loudspeaker seems to play only a minor part in forming a person's opinion.

    L.L. Beranek, Acoustics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954), p.208"

    Possibly true of ones own hifi system compared with ones friends?

    Leave a comment:


  • EricW
    replied
    Is junk science junk?

    I'm not crazy about the term "junk science". In practice, it seems to end up meaning "anything I disagree with and feel strongly about" so it's simply a term of abuse. Deserved in some cases maybe, but not in others, so it becomes mere use of an epithet doesn't advance anyone's understanding of anything very much.

    For example, some say climate change/global warming is "junk science" even though many apparently reputable scientists seem to consider it a real phenomenon. Unless you're a scientist yourself, your position on the issue is more likely to be determined by other ideological and social factors, and not by an impartial review of the scientific literature.

    It's never a bad idea to stick to what you know.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X