Announcement

Collapse

HUG - here for all audio enthusiasts

Since its inception ten years ago, the Harbeth User Group's ambition has been to create a lasting knowledge archive. Knowledge is based on facts and observations. Knowledge is timeless. Knowledge is human independent and replicatable. However, we live in new world where thanks to social media, 'facts' have become flexible and personal. HUG operates in that real world.

HUG has two approaches to contributor's Posts. If you have, like us, a scientific mind and are curious about how the ear works, how it can lead us to make the right - and wrong - decisions, and about the technical ins and outs of audio equipment, how it's designed and what choices the designer makes, then the factual area of HUG is for you. The objective methods of comparing audio equipment under controlled conditions has been thoroughly examined here on HUG and elsewhere and can be easily understood and tried with negligible technical knowledge.

Alternatively, if you just like chatting about audio and subjectivity rules for you, then the Subjective Soundings sub-forum is you. If upon examination we think that Posts are better suited to one sub-forum than than the other, they will be redirected during Moderation, which is applied throughout the site.

Questions and Posts about, for example, 'does amplifier A sounds better than amplifier B' or 'which speaker stands or cables are best' are suitable for the Subjective Soundings area.

The Moderators' decision is final in all matters regarding what appears here. That said, very few Posts are rejected. HUG Moderation individually spell and layout checks Posts for clarity but due to the workload, Posts in the Subjective Soundings area, from Oct. 2016 will not be. We regret that but we are unable to accept Posts that present what we consider to be free advertising for products that Harbeth does not make.

That's it! Enjoy!

{Updated Nov. 2016A}
See more
See less

Mono-blocking SHL5's

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mono-blocking SHL5's

    HUG,

    I have seriously been thinking about mono-blocking my SHL5s for several months now. Is the return on my investment worthwhile or should I be content with what I have? Content...does this word even exist in this hobby?

    I'd be interested in hearing if any members have gone this route, what the results were and if their expectations were met.

    Thanks.

    M

  • #2
    Mono-blocks

    Hi Marsanz,

    I think that some members covered this few days ago. Someone was asking about mono-blocking his Harbeth with Quad 405-2.

    Plus, you'll find other opinions by searching the archives. In what I read, there are not a lot of members who mono-block their speakers. Most of them seem to prefer investing their money elsewhere. On music, for example.

    Sebastien

    Comment


    • #3
      Mono-blocks - a needless persuit?

      Mono-blocking Quad 405's is probably not worth the effort and costs. Furthermore IIRC, the 405 design is not suitable for bridging if that was to be considered.

      However, some amps are designed as mono-blocks and these are often very good designs indeed. For instance, I was listening to my new SHL5's yesterday with a pair of the new Albarry M608 mono-block amps and it sounded wonderful. These amps are only available as mono-blocks because the designer believes that this is the way to obtain maximum separation of the channels, essential for good stereo.

      {Moderator's comment: wrong goal, needless complexity. It's the stereo recording that defines the width and needed channel separation not the amp. All you need is about 50dB separation (better than the best PU cartridge) which a $200 supermarket amp will give you.}

      Comment


      • #4
        Maybe it is a needless pursuit but a necessary rituals such as experimenting with mono blocking, cables and etc etc. If it wasn't for those unnecessary rituals in pursuit of the best sound I wouldn't have discovered Harbeth.

        ST

        {Moderator's comment: Necessary? Absolutely not. A personal curiosity - definitely.}

        Comment


        • #5
          It kept me awake... now I don't notice the system behind the music ...

          {Moderator's comment: Necessary? Absolutely not. A personal curiosity - definitely.}

          It is more than personal curiosity. It keeps your mind focused towards your equipments (NOT MUSIC!). I used to listen for four hours daily and it increased significantly in the first few months after acquiring SHL5. After, being fully satisfied with Harbeth I find there is no more motivation to sit still and listen to the speakers or amps or cables. I am now immersed in the music and often fall asleep (more of half asleep half awake state of being) if I sit quietly doing nothing while listening to the music. So much so, now I on the system for about a good an hour listening and though it is never enough but at least I enjoy every minutes of it without falling asleep. Gone were the days, when I tag along my friends to go for a listening session at other places. Harbeth became a perfect companion for my musical enjoyment that sometimes I don't even notice the system behind the music.


          ST

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by hifi_dave View Post

            {Moderator's comment: wrong goal, needless complexity. It's the stereo recording that defines the width and needed channel separation not the amp. All you need is about 50dB separation (better than the best PU cartridge) which a $200 supermarket amp will give you.}
            Tell that to Krell, Audio Research, Leben, Radford, Leak, Quad, Albarry, LFD, Ayre, EAR, Rega, Sugden, Audionote, Jadis, Conrad Johnson, TE, Tron, Bryston and so many other companies I can't even list.

            For the best sound and separation, many, many companies over the years have opted for mono-block operation or two complete mono amps on one chassis.

            {Moderator's comment: Excellent marketing on their behalf. Bravo!}

            Comment


            • #7
              Monoblocks ....

              Erm i too do not subscribe to the idea that a mono block would automatically confer better sound. Have heard many huge mono blocks pumping out 500 to 1000 watts per channel & none the more musical. That's why i always felt that low efficiency or hard to drive speakers will never sound musical because the amps driving them are often humongous & amps as such are often less musical than so called wimpy or simpler integrateds. From my experience, all but the most musical amps have been those below 100 wpc & many British integrateds fall into these category. I have seen & heard many small UK integrateds from the 80s such as Cyrus 1, Arcam Alpha, Creek 4140, Onix OA-21 & Naim Nait beating the pants off those huge & heavyweight American & japanese counterparts in terms of subtlety, musicality & tonality.

              As luck would have it, late last year i heard a Naim Nait 5i beating a much more expensive Swissmade pre/power at a local store dealing with second hand stuff. Both amps were driving the old M40. The guy said the Swiss amp don't match well with the M40. Out of curiosity, i asked him to try another pair of speakers & guess what, the results were still the same. The Naim Nait 5i is simply more musical, natural & involving. So much for high end!

              Comment


              • #8
                My twopenny worth .....

                This thread started as a simple request for user experience with mono blocks, but seems to have been diverted.

                To answer Marsanz's question here's my experience reported on HUG a couple of years ago:
                http://www.harbeth.co.uk/usergroup/s...ier&highlight=

                David

                Comment


                • #9
                  The Harbeth "value proposition"

                  Perhaps I could comment.

                  I/we don't doubt that there are some users who in some circumstances will benefit from investing considerable amount of money in what must honestly be rated as very small incremental enhancements in their system. I/we take no issue with that. In a consumer's democracy the consumer is free to spend as he sees fit. We endorse that fully. That's the best economic system that mankind knows of. The problem we at Harbeth have is of proportionality. By that I mean the relative improvement (although degradation is indeed also possible) that could result from spending very considerable amounts of time and money on accessories.

                  Let's step back and be honest with each other. We all know that one characteristic common to many hifi enthusiasts is the desire to tinker. That's absolutely understandable. That's at the heart of many hobbies and interests. Our view is that we do our absolute utmost to squeeze the last gramme of performance out of our designs and as simple electro-mechanical devices, loudspeakers are by far, far, far the weakest components in the hifi chain. And hence, it seems logical to give great priority to the purchase of the best possible speakers as that is where the biggest return-on-investment can be expected.

                  My concern is that to use some marketing terminology, the "value proposition" of the Harbeth brand is one of solid, pragmatic, old fashioned, honest-to-goodness, real-world, high-integrity engineering and business ethics. Even hinting that there are further tangible improvement in overall sound quality by investing far larger sums in electronics, cables, spikes etc. just doesn't lie comfortably with that 'value proposition' and may well send the unintended message to the consumer that his already considerable outlay on the speakers is merely one rung on a never ending ladder of expense. It isn't and it must not be.

                  It is also true that as Harbeth does not sell or manufacture accessories or electronics that our view about such is biassed. I fully accept that. But when you hear, as I did these last few days, the acoustic mess that is the reality of a pair of speakers pushing sound into a small room the issue of proportionality must be taken seriously.

                  Here is the link to my experience at the show, and here is what the microphone hears when walking into various rooms in the bedroom exhibition space at a hifi show: (best heard in headphones, even inexpensive ones will do)



                  Does it sound like the performers are really there live in the room? Is it likely that a monoblock amplifier in any one of these rooms (and there may have been some) would elevate the performance from the mundane to the sublime? Is it not logical that an investment in the speakers, then the room acoustics would be likely to yield by far the biggest improvement in fidelity?

                  There are excellent reasons for and immense satisfaction to be achieved from investing in and owning beautiful, well conceived, well made and durable things - art, cars, homes and audio equipment amongst them. But IMHO the warm glow of ownership should not be misrepresented as a significant performance enhancement. That's a quite separate matter.
                  Alan A. Shaw
                  Designer, owner
                  Harbeth Audio UK

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Don't buy for the technology - buy for the sound

                    Quite so but my point was that I am enjoying my new Harbeth SHL5's in stunning Tiger Ebony being driven by an amplifier which happens to be a mono-block design.

                    The new Albarry M608 is a slight re-vamp of the well known, all British Albarry M408 first produced in the early 80's and now brought up to date. The price of a pair of these is less than you could pay for a decent integrated but they make sublime music through my Harbeths. The designer/manufacturer is a long time fan of Harbeth and his ideals coincide nicely with Harbeth.

                    I also get stunning results with some integrated amps and a couple of valve based designs but I have no need for large, expensive American amps as, to my mind, they don't bring anything extra to the sound. I've been there, done that and have several T-shirts to prove it.

                    I don't buy anything because of the technology, it's the sound which comes before all else.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Albarry amp

                      Originally posted by hifi_dave View Post
                      Quite so but my point was that I am enjoying my new Harbeth SHL5's in stunning Tiger Ebony being driven by an amplifier which happens to be a mono-block design.

                      The new Albarry M608 is a slight re-vamp of the well known, all British Albarry M408 first produced in the early 80's and now brought up to date. The price of a pair of these is less than you could pay for a decent integrated but they make sublime music through my Harbeths. The designer/manufacturer is a long time fan of Harbeth and his ideals coincide nicely with Harbeth.

                      I also get stunning results with some integrated amps and a couple of valve based designs but I have no need for large, expensive American amps as, to my mind, they don't bring anything extra to the sound. I've been there, done that and have several T-shirts to prove it.

                      I don't buy anything because of the technology, it's the sound which comes before all else.

                      Interesting to know that Albarry is still around. Like many other small british manufacturers, its an extremely low profile company as well. I recall hearing an Albarry integrated in the 90s but didn't sound very convincing. Probably has to do with the speakers it was driving.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Swapping DAC + amps for single integrated ....

                        Some interesting points here. I use monoblocs with my P3ESR's but I had them long before the Harbeth's arrived so I cannot directly compare a stereo amplifier. While I am more than happy with the system and more importantly the music, one of the things that does 'bug' me is the number of boxes and associated cables and cable dressing that comes with it. My amplification alone consists of six seperate boxes - add to that the DAC and source and you start to get the picture!

                        My serious consideration this year is getting rid of the DAC and six boxes of amplification for an integrated amp with a digital input!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Digital boxes ....

                          Six boxes just for amplification? Wow....are those Naims btw? I'd rather u keep the DAC & just get a good Integrated. I heard that its not a good idea to incorporate a digital input into an amplifier sharing the same chassis.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            A stack of monoblocks ...

                            Originally posted by Gan CK View Post
                            Six boxes just for amplification? Wow....are those Naims btw? I'd rather u keep the DAC & just get a good Integrated. I heard that its not a good idea to incorporate a digital input into an amplifier sharing the same chassis.
                            Nope, the amplification is not Naim - it's DNM; a 3C Six pre amp and PA2B mono's (each of the pre amp and mono's have their own seperate PSU). To be fair, each box is discrete and not full width either. The DAC is Naim. The (fully) integrated replacement I'm considering is the Devialet D Premier but I'm open to keeping the DAC and looking at an integrated from Karan or Lavardin.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Harbeth + DNM

                              Originally posted by Bodfish View Post
                              Nope, the amplification is not Naim - it's DNM; a 3C Six pre amp and PA2B mono's (each of the pre amp and mono's have their own seperate PSU). To be fair, each box is discrete and not full width either. The DAC is Naim. The (fully) integrated replacement I'm considering is the Devialet D Premier but I'm open to keeping the DAC and looking at an integrated from Karan or Lavardin.
                              Oh its DNM. Heard lots of good things about DNM but unfortunately no chance to hear them in action, esp with Harbeths. Well, would like to add another integrated for your consideration & that's the LFD NCSE.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X