HUG - here for all audio enthusiasts

At its inception ten years ago, the Harbeth User Group's ambition was to create a lasting knowledge archive. Knowledge is based on facts and observations. Knowledge is timeless, independent of the observer and can be replicated. However, we live in new world in which objective facts have become flexible, personal and debatable. HUG operates in that real world, and that has now been reflected in the structure of HUG.

HUG has two approaches to contributor's Posts. If you, like us, have a scientific mind and are curious about how the ear works, how it can lead us to make the right - and wrong - decisions, and about the technical ins and outs of audio equipment, how it's designed and what choices the designer makes, then the factual Science of Audio sub-forum area of HUG is your place. The objective methods of comparing audio equipment under controlled conditions has been thoroughly examined here on HUG and elsewhere and can be readily understood by non-experts and tried-out at home without deep technical knowledge.

Alternatively, if you just like chatting about audio and subjectivity rules for you, then the Subjective Soundings area is you. If upon examination we think that Posts are better suited to one sub-forum than than the other, they will be redirected during Moderation, which is applied throughout the site.

Questions and Posts about, for example, 'does amplifier A sounds better than amplifier B' or 'which speaker stands or cables are best' are suitable for the Subjective Soundings area. From Oct. 2016, Posts in the Subjective Soundings area will not be spell checked or adjusted for layout clarity. We regret that but we are unable to accept Posts that present what we consider to be free advertising for products that Harbeth does not make.

The Moderators' decision is final in all matters and Harbeth does not necessarily agree with the contents of any member contributions and has no control over external content.

That's it! Enjoy!

{Updated Jan. 2017}
See more
See less

Duelund Silver Cable

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Duelund Silver Cable


    Duelund Wires In Silk sleeve
    Version1.0 - 20AWG
    Version 2.0 - 18AWG

    anybody tried these? i keen to try the version2.0 as speaker cable with length of 2m.

    will the flatness help / change anything?? be it improvement or differences?

  • #2
    Interconnects to solve room acoustics???

    Tried the wider one as an interconnect between Sugden Masterclass CD and Integrated amp with copper wbt 102 next gen plugs found they initialy sounded good but in end seemed to smooth out mid and high notes were rather wiry.

    At the moment am using 0.75 orange two core flymo type wire for my SHL5s with 6m runs. Have used QED silver anniversary and Vandamme 6mm shotgun LC UPOFC and 2.5 three core from B&Q with earth and neutral wired together.

    Have quite a lively listening room so am having trouble with natural sounding mids. The sound quality is in order I've listed them with Orange 0.75 best. Next will try Vandamme 1.50 Black Series Speaker cable as it is more conductor UPOFC but only 30 strands, as I suspect the SHL5 can count and prefers small numbers !!