HUG - here for all audio enthusiasts

At its inception ten years ago, the Harbeth User Group's ambition was to create a lasting knowledge archive. Knowledge is based on facts and observations. Knowledge is timeless, independent of the observer and can be replicated. However, we live in new world in which objective facts have become flexible, personal and debatable. HUG operates in that real world, and that has now been reflected in the structure of HUG.

HUG has two approaches to contributor's Posts. If you, like us, have a scientific mind and are curious about how the ear works, how it can lead us to make the right - and wrong - decisions, and about the technical ins and outs of audio equipment, how it's designed and what choices the designer makes, then the factual Science of Audio sub-forum area of HUG is your place. The objective methods of comparing audio equipment under controlled conditions has been thoroughly examined here on HUG and elsewhere and can be readily understood by non-experts and tried-out at home without deep technical knowledge.

Alternatively, if you just like chatting about audio and subjectivity rules for you, then the Subjective Soundings area is you. If upon examination we think that Posts are better suited to one sub-forum than than the other, they will be redirected during Moderation, which is applied throughout the site.

Questions and Posts about, for example, 'does amplifier A sounds better than amplifier B' or 'which speaker stands or cables are best' are suitable for the Subjective Soundings area. From Oct. 2016, Posts in the Subjective Soundings area will not be spell checked or adjusted for layout clarity. We regret that but we are unable to accept Posts that present what we consider to be free advertising for products that Harbeth does not make.

The Moderators' decision is final in all matters and Harbeth does not necessarily agree with the contents of any member contributions and has no control over external content.

That's it! Enjoy!

{Updated Jan. 2017}
See more
See less

Realistic Recordings of Piano

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Realistic Recordings of Piano

    Do you have an album or album track on which the sound of the piano seems particularly realistic? We all have our own preferences, of course, say for the harder sound from next to the piano or the more reverberant sound from the 15th row of a lovely recording hall, but what recordings sound most like a real piano to you?

    I'll start:

    Mozart: Piano Quartets, Beaux Arts Trio
    Horowitz at Home, tracks: the Mozart sonata
    Horowitz at the Met, tracks: Scarlatti sonatas


  • #2
    Herbie Hancock: The Piano, tracks: My Funny Valentine & Blue Otani


    • #3
      ivo pogorelich plays moussorgsky: pictures at an exhibition. incredible CD.

      Harbeth M40.1-Naim NAC52-Supercap-NAP 135-CDS2-XPS


      • #4
        Many of them, these few night and now I am enjoying:
        - Argerich/Abbado/Mahler chamber orchestra beethoven piano concerto 3&2
        - Pires/Abbado/Chamber orchestra of Europe Mozart piano concerto 21&26
        - Argerich/Dutoit/Montreal Chopin piano concert 1&2

        "Bath with Music"


        • #5
          In addition to what Keith has mentioned above, i would like to add this one....Liszt piano concerto No 1...very compelling performance!


          • #6
            Add this too:
            Debussy Preludes & l'Isle Joyeuse by Maurizio Pollini on DGG 458 187-2.
            A well made very natural piano recording, imho.

            "If all else fails, read the instructions"


            • #7
              Add one more album i am listening now:
              - the art of Alfred brendel vol.1 virtouso pieces in Vanguard label featuring chopin polonaise and liszt Hungarian rhapsodies.
              "Bath with Music"