"This Harbeth User Group (HUG) is the Manufacturer's own managed forum dedicated to natural sound from microphone to ear, achievable by recognising and controlling the numerous confounding variables that exist along the audio chain. The Harbeth designer's objective is to make loudspeakers that contribute little of themselves to the music passing through them.

Identifying system components for their sonic neutrality should logically proceed from the interpretation and analysis of their technical, objective performance. Deviations from a flat frequency response at any point along the signal chain from microphone to ear is likely to give an audible sonic personality to the system at your ear; this includes the significant contribution of the listening room itself. To accurately reproduce the recorded sound as Harbeth speakers are designed to do, you would be best advised to select system components (sources, electronics, cables and so on) that do not color the sound before it reaches the speakers.

For example, the design of and interaction between the hifi amplifier and its speaker load can and will alter the sound balance of what you hear. This may or may not be what you wish to achieve, but any deviation from a flat response is a step away from a truly neutral system. HUG has extensively discussed amplifiers and the methods for seeking the most objectively neutral among a plethora of product choices.

HUG specialises in making complex technical matters simple to understand, getting at the repeatable facts in a post-truth environment where objectivity is increasingly ridiculed. With our heritage of natural sound and pragmatic design, HUG is not the best place to discuss non-Harbeth audio components selected, knowingly or not, to introduce a significantly personalised system sound. For that you should do your own research and above all, make the effort to visit an Authorised Dealer and listen to your music at your loudness on your loudspeakers through the various offerings there. There is really no on-line substitute for time invested in a dealer's showroom because 'tuning' your system to taste is such a highly personal matter. Our overall objective here is to empower readers to make the factually best procurement decisions in the interests of lifelike music at home.

Please consider carefully how much you should rely upon and be influenced by the subjective opinions of strangers. Their hearing acuity and taste will be different to yours, as will be their motives and budget, their listening distance, loudness and room treatment, not necessarily leading to appropriate equipment selection and listening satisfaction for you. Always keep in mind that without basic test equipment, subjective opinions will reign unchallenged. With test equipment, universal facts and truths are exposed.

If some of the science behind faithfully reproducing the sound intended by the composer, score, conductor and musicians over Harbeth speakers is your thing, this forum has been helping with that since 2006. If you just want to share your opinions and photos with others then the unrelated Harbeth Speakers Facebook page may be for you. Either way, welcome to the world of Harbeth!"

Feb. 2018
See more
See less

harbeth monitor 30 vs monitor 30.1 .2

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • harbeth monitor 30 vs monitor 30.1 .2

    I've been many years loving my monitor 30 and I wonder if I should think 30.1 or 30.2, I have some adjustable audio craftsmanship I think the skyland and others are better, here in Spain I can only get the ropes or hifi rack, now I'm going to Have a child and I would like them to be safe, a greeting from Spain

  • #2

    Nobody has tried the 30 and then the 30.1 or both at the same time


    • #3
      Yes, I did when the 30.1 was introduced. In broad terms, the earlier model sounds a bit thinner, a bit brighter and not as refined. The 30.1 is smoother and has a slightly more natural mid band. Now, I am not saying this is night and day but the 30.1 is an evolution and not a revolution.


      • #4
        I have the 30, but have listened to both. I would call the 30.1 an "intelligent refinement" of the 30. Main difference is the slightly more open sound of the 30.1, which I prefer. However, if some strange bloke sneaked into my listening room and replaced a 30 with a 30.1 in one of the channels, I'm not sure I'd ever notice the difference. That's how close they are.