Announcement

Collapse

INTRODUCTION - PLEASE READ FIRST TO UNDERSTAND THIS FORUM!

"This Harbeth User Group (HUG) is the Manufacturer's own managed forum dedicated to natural sound from microphone to ear, achievable by recognising and controlling the numerous confounding variables that exist along the audio chain. The Harbeth designer's objective is to make loudspeakers that contribute little of themselves to the music passing through them.

Identifying system components for their sonic neutrality should logically proceed from the interpretation and analysis of their technical, objective performance, since deviations from a flat frequency response at any point along the signal chain from microphone to ear is likely to create an audible sonic personality in what you hear. That includes the contribution of the listening room itself. To accurately reproduce the recorded sound, as Harbeth speakers are designed to do, you would be advised to select system components (sources, electronics, cables and so on) that do not color the sound before it reaches the speakers.

For example, the design of and interaction between the hifi amplifier and its speaker load can and potentially will alter the sound balance of what you hear. This may or may not be what you wish to achieve, but on the face of it, any deviation from a flat response - and the frequency balance of tube amplifiers are usually influenced by their speaker load - is a step away from a truly neutral system. HUG has extensively discussed amplifiers and the methods for seeking the most objectively neutral amongst a plethora of available product choices.

HUG specialises in making complex technical matters simple to understand, aiding the identification of audio components likely to maintain a faithful relationship between the recorded sound and the sound you hear. With our heritage of natural sound and pragmatism, HUG cannot be expected to be a place to discuss the selection, approval or endorsement of non-Harbeth system elements selected, knowingly or not, to create a significantly personalised sound. For that you should do your own research and above all, make the effort to visit an Authorised Dealer and listen to your music at your loudness on your loudspeakers through the various offerings there. There is really no on-line substitute for time invested in a dealer's showroom because 'tuning' your system to taste is such a highly personal matter.

Please consider carefully how much you should rely upon and be influenced by the subjective opinions of strangers. Their hearing acuity and taste will be different to yours, as will be their motives and budget, their listening distance, loudness and room treatment, not necessarily leading to appropriate equipment selection and listening satisfaction for you.

If faithfully reproducing the sound intended by the composer, score, conductor and musicians in your home and over Harbeth speakers is your audio dream, then understanding something of the issues likely to fulfill that intention is what this forum has been helping to do since 2006. Welcome!"


Feb. 2018
See more
See less

harbeth monitor 30 vs monitor 30.1 .2

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • harbeth monitor 30 vs monitor 30.1 .2


    I've been many years loving my monitor 30 and I wonder if I should think 30.1 or 30.2, I have some adjustable audio craftsmanship I think the skyland and others are better, here in Spain I can only get the ropes or hifi rack, now I'm going to Have a child and I would like them to be safe, a greeting from Spain

  • #2

    Nobody has tried the 30 and then the 30.1 or both at the same time

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes, I did when the 30.1 was introduced. In broad terms, the earlier model sounds a bit thinner, a bit brighter and not as refined. The 30.1 is smoother and has a slightly more natural mid band. Now, I am not saying this is night and day but the 30.1 is an evolution and not a revolution.

      Comment


      • #4
        I have the 30, but have listened to both. I would call the 30.1 an "intelligent refinement" of the 30. Main difference is the slightly more open sound of the 30.1, which I prefer. However, if some strange bloke sneaked into my listening room and replaced a 30 with a 30.1 in one of the channels, I'm not sure I'd ever notice the difference. That's how close they are.

        Comment

        Working...
        X