Announcement

Collapse

HUG - here for all audio enthusiasts

Since its inception ten years ago, the Harbeth User Group's ambition has been to create a lasting knowledge archive. Knowledge is based on facts and observations. Knowledge is timeless. Knowledge is human independent and replicatable. However, we live in new world where thanks to social media, 'facts' have become flexible and personal. HUG operates in that real world.

HUG has two approaches to contributor's Posts. If you have, like us, a scientific mind and are curious about how the ear works, how it can lead us to make the right - and wrong - decisions, and about the technical ins and outs of audio equipment, how it's designed and what choices the designer makes, then the factual area of HUG is for you. The objective methods of comparing audio equipment under controlled conditions has been thoroughly examined here on HUG and elsewhere and can be easily understood and tried with negligible technical knowledge.

Alternatively, if you just like chatting about audio and subjectivity rules for you, then the Subjective Soundings sub-forum is you. If upon examination we think that Posts are better suited to one sub-forum than than the other, they will be redirected during Moderation, which is applied throughout the site.

Questions and Posts about, for example, 'does amplifier A sounds better than amplifier B' or 'which speaker stands or cables are best' are suitable for the Subjective Soundings area.

The Moderators' decision is final in all matters regarding what appears here. That said, very few Posts are rejected. HUG Moderation individually spell and layout checks Posts for clarity but due to the workload, Posts in the Subjective Soundings area, from Oct. 2016 will not be. We regret that but we are unable to accept Posts that present what we consider to be free advertising for products that Harbeth does not make.

That's it! Enjoy!

{Updated Nov. 2016A}
See more
See less

Getting a 3D holographic presentation from 40.1

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Getting a 3D holographic presentation from 40.1

    I recently listened to a toys for boys speakers and it was impressive to say the least. It was played in the living room and not only was the presentation 3D with the musicians seemingly located in the room but also of the right scale i.e the piano doesnt sound like it is 20 feet big. Best, musical as well.

    I have a musical system driven by a USD100 (15watt) amp but want to extract the full potential of the 40.1. Is that wrong?

    The following is extracted from the Harbeth site on the 40.1 .......

    "The speaker is completely transparent and paints a 3D holographic sound stage which is totally addictive for its neutrality."

    The 40.1 can deliver the scale of a live performance but how can I achieve a 3D holographic sound? is it a matter of placement or room acoustics?

  • #2
    The 3D effect

    I can certainly achieve that in my demo room with a range of electronics. Placement and room acoustics play a large part in the process and my present room is far from ideal. I am planning an extension in the Spring but until then I have to struggle on with the help of some home made absorbers behind and to the sides of the speakers.

    The imagery is very good indeed but the 3d effect is better with some electronics than others. Of course, best results are from a good TT combo.

    Comment


    • #3
      Realistic amplifier speaker combination?

      Originally posted by Kathylim View Post
      ...I have a musical system driven by a USD100 (15watt) amp but want to extract the full potential of the 40.1. Is that wrong?
      Are you sure that it's an ever-achievable sonic objective with an amp that falls below the 'ideal' minimum specification we give for the M40.1?

      If you refer to the M40.1 page on the Harbeth brochure here you'll see that I mention 50W, not 15W, as the minimum amp spec for what is a large three-way system. If the amp is priced at $100, one can only guess at the material cost and you could probably buy a few beers for the same component outlay. I'd strongly suggest that you invest in an amplifier that's more of a natural match to this flagship speaker!
      Alan A. Shaw
      Designer, owner
      Harbeth Audio UK

      Comment


      • #4
        My 1974 Sansui amp

        Alan, thank you for your reply. I am familiar with the recommended minimum specification.

        The amp is a Sansui Au101 made in 1974. I bought it 2 years ago for USD100 and in good condition (recapped). I may appear to you that I may have taken the "any decent amp will do" doctrine to the extreme but I can assure you, it is a decent amp.

        I settled with the Sansui in my system as it is the only amp which gives me glimpses, though faint, of a 3D presentation from time to time on certain recordings. As I have not been able to achieve the ideal presentation from the 40.1 it came down to just enjoying the music which the Sansui does quite well but has always left me wondering whether the 40.1 is capable of more. Though 15 watts, it allows me to play most music even rock at spls loud enough to cause hearing damage, if for an extended time.

        I have tried the, Leben CS600 (32watts),LFD (60 watts), Exposure 2010s (55 watts) and the Pathos Logos (110watts) with the 40.1. All have not been able to deliver that 3D sound. With the exception of the Sansui, the presentation from the other amps is recessed/flat against the wall.

        I believe Dave will attest to some of the mentioned amps being of decent quality and based on his reply, has tried some of them, with success.

        Based upon the foregoing, do I discount the amp? but why is the Sansui able to deliver some of the desired effects but not the rest?

        Comment


        • #5
          Typo?

          100 USD must be a joke or a typo...

          Grt. Mike

          Comment


          • #6
            Not a typo ...

            Not a typo nor a joke. But a joke would be say having owned an Audio Research CD7, Ref 3, Vt100 mk iii and a Pass Labs 350.5x and not getting the music nor the ideal presentation.

            Comment


            • #7
              The holy grail of audio

              Originally posted by Kathylim View Post
              Alan, thank you for your reply. I am familiar with the recommended minimum specification.

              The amp is a Sansui Au101 made in 1974. I bought it 2 years ago for USD100 and in good condition (recapped). I may appear to you that I may have taken the "any decent amp will do" doctrine to the extreme but I can assure you, it is a decent amp....
              Clearly there is a strong emotional bond between you and this nearly forty year old mid-market amplifier. I respect that. But can you see the irony of the situation? You are seeking fast track to the holy grail of two channel audio reproduction (a 3D sound stage) but your route there is in a Morris Oxford.

              Common sense tells me - and I know nothing whatever of your amplifier - that even in the slowly-evolving world of audio amplifier technology, a contemporary mid-price amp will surely outperform a tired forty year old specimen. There are so many reasonably priced modern examples to chose from that are discussed here on HUG. And they need not cost a fortune. If there was absolutely no progress in amplifier design over the past forty years then we'd all be using classics, and the amplifier industry would have closed down long ago. Modern amplifier designers have the audio measuring tools, track layout CAD and a generation of skills at optimising circuitry that were only a science fiction dream back then. And they've used them intelligently: so intelligently that the differences between modern amps are tiny.

              My honest opinion is that you are never going to reach your goal unless you take a cold, hard look at the necessary investment you need to make in your entire system to match the performance potential of your class-leading Monitor 40s. And 15W power for the M40.1 is far below my recommendation.
              Alan A. Shaw
              Designer, owner
              Harbeth Audio UK

              Comment


              • #8
                What is a necessary investment?

                Originally posted by A.S. View Post
                But can you see the irony of the situation? You are seeking fast track to the holy grail of two channel audio reproduction (a 3D sound stage) but your route there is in a Morris Oxford.

                There are so many reasonably priced modern examples to chose from that are discussed here on HUG. And they need not cost a fortune.

                My honest opinion is that you are never going to reach your goal unless you take a cold, hard look at the necessary investment you need to make in your entire system to match the performance potential of your Monitor 40s.
                After the many paths I have travelled, I am surprised there is even one...i.e a fast track to the holy grail.

                Well the Sansui resides in my system simply because the other mid market amplifiers I have tried and mentioned in my earlier post have not produced the desired results. I am now confused as to what constitutes the necessary investment to my entire system if I am to discount the other mentioned amps and of course the Sansui.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Krells to the rescue!

                  Kathylim, you may borrow my Krell amp anytime... Full 150 "Modern" Watts all at your disposal. Its a Krell of the no-nonsense Dan D'agostino era. Then please do share back the findings here?

                  I am fully aware of the esteemed Mr. AS refraining from giving any endorsement to any amp brand, but at least it might pass through his seal of approval (a silent nod would suffice) to having 40.1s driven by a 150 Watter...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Picture of your set-up

                    A picture of your setup would be helpful to those wishing to provide suggestions.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Necessary investment?

                      I am not too sure on the suggestion of making the necessary investment to match the performance potential of the class-leading Monitor 40s and to achieve Kathylim's goal. The OP has highlighted earlier that he had tried some of the modern amps that fit the M40.1's criteria (>50W), and to his ears these amps do not sound as convincing as the 15W vintage Sansui, and they do not deliver the 3-D soundstage well enough.

                      Considering Harbeth's take on negligible or zero sonic differences between amplifiers, I cannot see the reason how a necessary investment in modern amplification will resolve the OP's issue due to Harbeth's philosophy in the topic of amplifier.

                      {Moderator's comment: how are we supposed to progress this discussion if the user is intentionally ignoring our recommendation? We say minimum 50W. The Sansui is rated at 15W. Consult the brochure and you will see the only Harbeth that we recommend a 15W amp with is the smallest Harbeth. The P3ESR. The biggest Harbeth *needs more amp power* because it demand more power due to three drive units plus complex crossover. This issue must be resolved first.}

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        150W Krell - and why we specify minimum ratings

                        Originally posted by Heretic View Post
                        ...I am fully aware of the esteemed Mr. AS refraining from giving any endorsement to any amp brand, but at least it might pass through his seal of approval (a silent nod would suffice) to having 40.1s driven by a 150 Watter...
                        150W available to drive M40.1 and a first class amplifier brand reputation says to me that this is home setup is likely to deliver a great sonic experience with oodles of power reserve for those thrilling climaxes.

                        Consider this imperfect analogy: the (incandescent) light bulb lighting your room may well have a 150W rating. That will fill every corner of your room with bright light. Remove that bulb and fit a 15W (one tenth of the power) and what then? The room is miserably dark: there are deep shadows in the corners. You cannot even read. You are stumbling around in the gloom. Why would you want to live like that when you are advised that 50W is necessary to throw the minimum light into the environment?

                        I don't just dream-up the minimum amplifier requirements for the fun of it. I am aware that if I suggest a minimum amplifier power rating that's too high, those customers with smaller amps may be frightened off Harbeth and select another brand which emphasises higher efficiency. Conversely, I am aware that to produce a reasonable sound pressure level that gives a satisfying quasi-real life experience a certain amount of power is necessary. So the minimum power amp ratings I've listed in the brochure are really minimums bearing in mind that you should interpret the manufacturer's amplifier power outputs with a very large degree of scepticism. Outside the lab, many amps are unlikely to be able to deliver their rated power on music when driving real-world speakers.

                        What tube fans don't realise (and I've heard SHL5s driven by 300B 7W tubes and sounding good) is that when you connect a 'scope across the 7W amp's output terminals and look at the music waveform, it shows significant clipping. And that clipping may be present for 25%, 50% or even 100% of the time. That shouldn't be a surprise at all: 7W is a minuscule amount of power. So how is it that those users are satisfied with what they hear? Simple - the tube amp (and I stress this, the situation with a transistor amp is totally different) clips is a sonically benign way. In other words, it runs out of power in a way which does not immediately reveal itself to the human ear. It doesn't sound hard or coarse when clipping: it sounds fat and warm. And that's all part of the magic sonic experience of small (tube) amps.

                        So - rule of thumb: give yourself a fighting chance of high fidelity sound at home: have a sensible amount of amplifier power available at all times.
                        Alan A. Shaw
                        Designer, owner
                        Harbeth Audio UK

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          75W NAIM gives perfect projection (3D if recorded well)

                          i drive my 40.1 with very old but completely refurbished naim 135 mono´s (rated 75 watt/8ohms , 120 watt / 4 ohms). the sound is perfectly projected into the room. yes, one can call it 3D, if you want. but generally i think, "3D sound" is only possible, if the record allows for it. most of the times it is 2D due to multi-miking or whatsoever.

                          in my room sound is widely spread between and behind the 40.1s. perfect, in one word.
                          far more interesting for me is the delicacy of tone color. nobody is more realistic in this field than Harbeth.

                          best,
                          delgesu
                          Harbeth M40.1-Naim NAC52-Supercap-NAP 135-CDS2-XPS

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            50W is mandatory

                            Hi Kathylim,

                            First of all my reply regarding the 100usd wasn't very thoughtful, my apologies. The cool thing is: many, many years ago I owned a Sansui 101. It was my first stereo amplifier! Really enjoyed the sound. Didn't realise this, but after rereading this thread.

                            I recently bought Monitor 30's (you can read my story in the recent Harbeth newsletter). I have listened to them on various amplifiers, with many different sources. They really grow on you after listening for a longer period. 50 watt is mandatory, so why not get a decent amplifier and use it for at least 2 weeks?

                            For what's worth it: I use an Accuphase 350, 100 watt neutral 3d energy ;-).

                            Grt. Mike

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Big speakers, small amps, modern buildings

                              Hi Kathy,

                              If you experience *a better sound with a under powered 15 watter amp for your M40.1 then you are having a speaker that is far too big for your listening area. Try the smaller Harbeths. And you are not the only one complaining about difficulties getting good sound from big *speakers. Another friend of mine living in your neighborhood driving another large speakers having the same difficulties. *I am beginning to suspect the design of the houses in area may not be ideal for big speakers unless you want to add large quantity of absorbers and other room treatment.

                              ST

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X