HUG - here for all audio enthusiasts

At its inception ten years ago, the Harbeth User Group's ambition was to create a lasting knowledge archive. Knowledge is based on facts and observations. Knowledge is timeless, independent of the observer and can be replicated. However, we live in new world in which objective facts have become flexible, personal and debatable. HUG operates in that real world, and that has now been reflected in the structure of HUG.

HUG has two approaches to contributor's Posts. If you, like us, have a scientific mind and are curious about how the ear works, how it can lead us to make the right - and wrong - decisions, and about the technical ins and outs of audio equipment, how it's designed and what choices the designer makes, then the factual Science of Audio sub-forum area of HUG is your place. The objective methods of comparing audio equipment under controlled conditions has been thoroughly examined here on HUG and elsewhere and can be readily understood by non-experts and tried-out at home without deep technical knowledge.

Alternatively, if you just like chatting about audio and subjectivity rules for you, then the Subjective Soundings area is you. If upon examination we think that Posts are better suited to one sub-forum than than the other, they will be redirected during Moderation, which is applied throughout the site.

Questions and Posts about, for example, 'does amplifier A sounds better than amplifier B' or 'which speaker stands or cables are best' are suitable for the Subjective Soundings area. From Oct. 2016, Posts in the Subjective Soundings area will not be spell checked or adjusted for layout clarity. We regret that but we are unable to accept Posts that present what we consider to be free advertising for products that Harbeth does not make.

The Moderators' decision is final in all matters and Harbeth does not necessarily agree with the contents of any member contributions and has no control over external content.

That's it! Enjoy!

{Updated Jan. 2017}
See more
See less

The real sound of some tweeters! Nature's way of demanding attention ...

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The real sound of some tweeters! Nature's way of demanding attention ...

    I made this recording last year of the annual return to nest of Great Tits (Parus major) to their nest above my front door. The tiny chicks have their parents dancing in non-stop attendance for two weeks or so as the chicks are insatiable.

    Last year I was ready to make a recording of the chicks in full song, just days before they took to the wing - which I missed every year and assume to be early in the morning.

    Playing this recording really makes the point that energy in what hi-fi listeners attribute to the tweeter band can be extremely fatiguing if not perfectly blended with that of the upper band of the bass/midrange driver. So here is what a clutch (perhaps four or five) of tiny tweeters sound like with accompanying spectral analysis.

    >>> Video talk-through here <<<
    Alan A. Shaw
    Designer, owner
    Harbeth Audio UK

  • #2
    The sweet sound of nature?

    I've read that a baby's cry falls right into the frequency range at which human hearing is most sensitive, which is why we find it so annoying - it demands immediate attention (for good evolutionary reasons).

    I've read that the Super HL5 has a slight "dip" in its midrange response. Bearing in mind the ear's great sensitivity to midrange frequencies, could this dip be in part responsible for the SHL5's "sweet" sound?


    • #3
      Anything is possible in audio!
      Alan A. Shaw
      Designer, owner
      Harbeth Audio UK


      • #4
        Beautiful birds

        Originally posted by EricW View Post
        could this dip be in part responsible for the SHL5's "sweet" sound?
        We have some of the most beautiful birds in the world down here, my fav. being the Rainbow Lorikeet, (Trichoglossus haematodus). When i mention this some people they go aghast. Beautiful and personable, not to mention highly intelligent as they may be, their oral outpours in the morning far outweigh their physical beauty to some. Maybe these lorikeets need some SHL5'ing.