Thanks Jferreir, I think I made a good choice and the dealer is one I've done significant business with in the past and has always done right by me. As to life getting in the way, I'm right with you on that one.
Originally Posted by jferreir
I have the opportunity to get a HEED phono stage and separte power supply which gets great reviews, but at this point my be undoable moneywise.
Thank for the advice and many hours of happy listening to both of us.
hifi_dave, thanks for your input. Many do seem to prefer the P5 to the Roksan while others hear it the opposite. For me, the Roksan is what is currently available from a source I have good previous experience with and one I trust. Its not the Mk2 model, but I believe its a good deal and within budget.
Originally Posted by hifi_dave
Anyone know anything about the Technics SL 5200 from the 80's? I've got one down in the basement, but from what I've read its not even close to the Technics 1200 that some still rave about or any of the TT's I'd bee considering.
A Rega P5 is a no-brainer as they say. It sounds better than the competition, is totally reliable and has great re-sale value. I had a Radius on demonstration for a while, I had taken it in p/x against a P7. It didn't sound anywhere near as good as the P5 and had speed stability problems. The latest version at nearly twice the price has addressed the earlier model's problems and also has a revised Nima arm to put that right.
The Earlier Radius would have low re-sale value now that the new model is here so I would expect the dealer to be offering it to you at a very good price !!!
I really would urge you to hear the P5 and the Michell Tecnodec before you commit yourself.
I think you have the correct attitude. I'm of the opinion that, much like computers, the best piece of equipment is that which suits your needs, preferences and circumstances (financial or otherwise). Additionally, a healthy relationship with a local dealer really is invaluable (not to mention that it supports the local economy). What's the sense in having a great turntable without the support and expertise to really make it sing? After this purchase, it's best to take a break from the marketing hype and just enjoy the music again.
I'm not familiar with that particular Technics model, but I would caution against assimilating the strengths of one model with the other. My parents, too, had a Technics from the 80's (forgot the model), and it was an utter POS. In fact, I think the motor blew on two separate occasions. Usually, I would be inclined to chalk this up to a "lemon", but I've seen this exact model floating around various shops and curbs, all of which appear to have similar issues.
If anything, why not drag the SL 5200 upstairs, clear off the dust, and use it as a practice table for alignment, VTA, etc? If you pick up some tools and a few inexpensive 'practice' records, it could be a good learning experience. Combined with some friendly advice from your local dealer, I think it would be a fun little journey. As for me, I'll keep fishing around for a $10 special at a local garage sale...
Don't you just love it when you give good advice and it's ignored?
Makes you wish you hadn't bothered (I like the Radius, but only because I'm a fan of the Nima arm, which takes the old Formula 4 ideal a few stages on..)
I found the V15 III a little flattened in terms of spatial perspectives at the time, although my Dual 701 turntable made it sound very much better. Used in an SME headshell, I also found a piece of green card-table baize between shell and cartridge improved things somewhat and SME provided their own blac-tac for similar purposes a few years later.
The V15VMR could sound enchanting and very close to the source, but get it wrong and it's as boring as can be. The stylus-suspension ages quickly too if you're unlucky and my wife clumped mine.........! Jico now appear to do a good quality replacement with SAS tip profile and this is selling for just over £100.
Regarding moving-coil types.. They may sound dull into a Quad 34 MC stage, but their responses usually go out to the cutting stylus resonance at 48KHz or so (the V15V series nosedives at 20KHz) and few of the modern designs sound dull in the slightest. My recommendation, if the tonearm is suited, would be for an AT OC9ML for starters as an excellent value *neutral* sounding cartridge with superb tracking/tracing, flat response and properly controlled bass reproduction, then possibly a Dynavector 17D series and, higher up but not necessarily better, a ZYX or Lyra, all of which generally having a neutral to lively balance to partly counteract the definite losses in LP record manufacture (and they are there, believe me)
I could be mistaken, but I think the advice came a bit too late (as opposed to being outright ignored). From what I can tell, the OP has already committed to the Radius, so there's no sense in making him (her?) feel cheated about the decision/result. Besides, advice is just that - it doesn't have to be taken.
Originally Posted by DSRANCE
Well, a certain snippet from AS earlier in the thread got me thinking and delving in my cartridge box....
The main deck at the moment is a Dual 701 which I've owned for more than twenty years. It's about to be pensioned off (with honours) to a secondary role, but in the meantime I remember having a V15III in standard and "Dual LM" versions with but one decent stylus between them. I had a spare headshell so re-mounted the LM body, which clips into the head-slide assembly and is anchored with two screws. I fitted the stylus, mounted and set up the head and sat back amazed...
I can see where Alan is coming from regarding some cartridges sounding "sucked out" and "dull" when compared to the V15III because they do. I suspect it's an additive thing because Harbeths and other "BBC" based cousins are hardly screamy at the crossover point as many competing models are, so a presence band "droop" will sound just that, rather than the V15 sounding toppy and "hard" with less well integrated speaker designs. Interestingly, a "Greatest Hits" album I have in to play right now (which wouldn't have got off to a good start in the first place) actually sounded listenable and a favourite topical (with some friends) Thomas Dolby LP sounded incredibly clear across the sound-stage. I just have to work out if the extra "space" in a typical moving coil type is actually there, or magnified by the transducer (not sure if it should be as mc's do it as my Decca (podded) Microscanner didn't, yet sounded incredibly close to some master-tape copies I had access to at the time)...
Anyway, thanks Alan for taking me back to the mid seventies (along with most of the rest of my current system) for a reality check. I'm really beginning to doubt all the magazines and reviewers now more than ever..
Next thing, get my "new" Quad 33 fettled to see if it really can be updated.............