Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: My ears Problem with PlayStation3 and Rega Apollo

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    England and Cyprus
    Posts
    370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EricW View Post
    There is always the much simpler expedient of watching a movie using the two-channel analog output from your DVD or Blu-ray player, and dispensing with all the complicated surround hardware.
    I prefer to listen to 5.1 sound reduced to two channel stereo. I find sound coming at me from all directions very disconcerting. It confuses my ageing ears.

    With good speakers I don't need a centre channel when sitting directly in front of a telly in a relatively small space.

    This observation, of course, is quite a separate issue from the acceptable use of a 5.1 AV amp in two channel stereo mode for playing music.

    Those who do enjoy 5.1 sound can, I believe, with the proper choice of products use the same system for excellent two channel stereo.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    105

    Default

    Well, a couple of topics in this thread: First, my old Arcam integrated buzzed unless I bypassed the tone controls. I replaced it with a 10 year old (at the time) McIntosh integrated, and that amplifier was dead silent.
    Second, I agree with the posts about 5.1 being overkill. I like systems that invite you into the music or soundtrack - surround sound is fired at you like a game of dodgeball. Finally, back to the original post - a cool test would be to level match the PS3 with the Rega, and compare them. IMO using a PS3 with an outboard DAC is a better investment, as the PS3 is a much more versatile piece of gear, and a DAC can accept other devices as well...

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    880

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cornelius View Post
    I like systems that invite you into the music or soundtrack - surround sound is fired at you like a game of dodgeball. ....
    I like that concept of being "invited" to enjoy something (rather than being bashed over the head with it).

    In fact, I may be wandering off-topic here, but this thread makes me wonder if there isn't another possible definition for "natural" sound (at which Harbeths of course excel). One definition may be the accurate reproduction of sound events as they occur in nature, whether human voice, an acoustic musical instrument, or something else (I think the magazine "The Absolute Sound" was named after this concept). But one objection to that idea is that so much of what we listen to these days is either electronically generated or electronic processed - how can such sounds be said to be "natural"?

    Which leads me to a second proposed definition, i.e., that "natural" sound is sound, however generated, that does not harm or offend or stress the human auditory or perceptual system, but works with it rather than against it. An analogy may be certain "natural" foods that do not occur in that precise form in nature (because there is some processing required to create them, e.g. miso, which is made from fermented soybeans), but are still accepted as healthy foods by the body, in contrast to processed snack foods, which are designed to zap the human sensory apparatus with intense primary tastes (salt! fat! sugar!), but which will harm you in the long run if you overconsume them.

    Harbeth: the healthy loudspeaker.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    835

    Default

    Personally, i can't get on with Home Cinema sound. If I watch a film, I don't want to be in the middle of World War 3, it makes me agitated and as for musiic, I don't want to be in the middle of the band.

    Some years ago, as a dealer, we stocked high end Home Cinema from the likes of Proceed, Levinson, Lexicon, Parasound, Denon (Limited) etc, which was about as good as it gets. We sold quite a few megabuck systems but were never satisfied with the reproduction of music, even with the sophisticated two channel throughputs etc. Great for films but not for music.

    Since those days, a few of our customers have drifted back to two channel. They usually start by dispensing with the centre channel and then the rears. After that, the processor goes and they're back to good ol' stereo for films and music. They've never been happier.

  5. #25
    Tran Khoa Guest

    Default

    Me i had 5 sets of home theather, from Bose to Yamaha, Klipsch,Paradigm, etc. I must say Movies in our time right now are made for surround, I mean action movies, horror, cartoons,.. i have tested all, and 7.1 is much better than 5.1. well for the feeling.
    And i watching in stereo for old movies. And listen the music with my Harbeth.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    34

    Default

    I'll go surround sound after I grow 3.1 more ears.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •